
In the Name of the Family by Sarah Dunant was published in 2017 by Virago and it’s a sequel to Blood and Beauty which I blogged about here so it’s a continuation of the Borgia family’s story. It’s a chunky read at 488 pages.
It begins in 1501 and Niccolo Machiavelli is a young poverty stricken diplomat and witness to many of the shenanigans going on within the Vatican where an elderly and ailing Rodrigo Borgia is still Pope Alexander VI. His daughter Lucrezia is now on her third husband, and is Duchess of Ferrara, her life isn’t her own, she’s used as a political pawn by her father and as ever for women of those times she’s under pressure to give birth to a male child. Pope Alexander’s remaining son Cesare realises that when his father dies the power that the Borgias have had is going to disappear. Cesare has never been one to toe the line.
The whole book is liberally scattered (or should I say pock marked) by references to the French pox as it had become almost an epidemic, it’s a historical fact that syphilis first appeared around this time, apparently brought to Italy by French troops.
I didn’t enjoy this one nearly as much as Blood and Beauty. I have a feeling that Dunant wasn’t as interested in this part of the Borgia story and even the arrival of Machiavelli didn’t help with what seemed to me to be quite a flat book. As you would expect not everyone agrees with me.
The Times has it on a list of Best Historical Fiction of 2017 describing it as ‘A stunning tale of power and family.’
History Today said it had been ‘Meticulously researched.’
Daily Mail said ‘Stuffed with violence, danger and passion.’
Mark Lawson of the Guardian said ‘Dunant has made completely her own the story of Italy’s most infamous ruling family … in a way that we can see, hear and smell.’
I have only read one Dunant – The Birth of Venus – and it did nothing for me at all. I didn’t connect with her writing style and the story never resonated. Foolishly I continue to think this must be my fault as so many people rate her books so highly! But I don’t think I’ll be trying another of her books; I’m content to accept that she’s just not for me.
Sandra,
I definitely agree with you, I’m sure we both have too many unread books by writers that we really rate – so why waste time in the company of an author that doesn’t do anything for you.